But when the second charged my dwarf cleric after stomping his foot and roaring.
My characters were level 6, I snuck up on them, got surpise round, killed one before they got a chance to act, but that sucker took 2 fireballs and a Guiding Bolt, plus my ranger had 2 attacks with his heavy crossbow and Hunters Mark. Solasta's minotaur fight was 1,000 times better. I was fighting 2 minotaurs last night and thought about the minotaur fight in BG3. I've been playing so much BG3 that I neglected Solasta, so I haven't beaten it yet, but so far, it is definitely better than PF. I cannot lose myself in their story the way I can with BG3. BG3 is a much more vivid and immersed experience, while Pathfinder just fails to scratch that rpg itch for me. For me at least, BG3's Faerun is a more breathing and living world than Owlcat's Golarion. I would definitely say that Larian is a better DM than Owlcat. I still say: BG3 is best, then Solasta, then Pathfinder. Wander into a wolf den and fight wolves that can hit someone with AC 25 by rolling an 8 or higher? Come on! Wolves? Knock you down and you try to get up and the whole pack kills you, with AC 25. I would never throw monsters at players that nearly kill them every fight. Don't make it so I'm struggling and have to constantly reload or "get good" just to play with normal rules. Gear the game for normal rules and then make it easier for noobs and harder for those who are crazy good. Don't give me a D&D game where I am constantly dying I'd I use normal ruleset. PF is frustrating as heck at times unless you really dumb down difficulty. Can't even get through Kingmaker.īG3 may have it's faults, but it's way more fun. I still don't understand the love for PF.